<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prevent Duplicate Content using the Canonical Url Tag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/164/prevent-duplicate-content-using-the-canonical-url-tag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/164/prevent-duplicate-content-using-the-canonical-url-tag/</link>
	<description>Web Design &#38; Development Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/164/prevent-duplicate-content-using-the-canonical-url-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-7393</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 22:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/?p=164#comment-7393</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-7389&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Daniel White &lt;/a&gt; 

Do you have any articles or links as I&#039;m still seeing sites being penalised for duplicate content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-7389" rel="nofollow">@Daniel White </a> </p>
<p>Do you have any articles or links as I&#8217;m still seeing sites being penalised for duplicate content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel White</title>
		<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/164/prevent-duplicate-content-using-the-canonical-url-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-7389</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 19:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/?p=164#comment-7389</guid>
		<description>Possibly good for other major search engines as Google no longer penalizes (and hasn&#039;t for some time) for duplicate but rather just filters out the duplicate content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly good for other major search engines as Google no longer penalizes (and hasn&#8217;t for some time) for duplicate but rather just filters out the duplicate content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Multiple Categorisation for SEO &#124; Web Design Talk</title>
		<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/164/prevent-duplicate-content-using-the-canonical-url-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-4001</link>
		<dc:creator>Multiple Categorisation for SEO &#124; Web Design Talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 15:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/?p=164#comment-4001</guid>
		<description>[...] text. Yes, the majority of ecommerce software and system will allow filtering of results, but the canonical url tag is often used and results in messy links that are not ignored by search engines.The major issue [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] text. Yes, the majority of ecommerce software and system will allow filtering of results, but the canonical url tag is often used and results in messy links that are not ignored by search engines.The major issue [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web design new york</title>
		<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/164/prevent-duplicate-content-using-the-canonical-url-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>web design new york</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/?p=164#comment-858</guid>
		<description>Thanks, we have often wondered how styop mutliple search pages getting indexed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, we have often wondered how styop mutliple search pages getting indexed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/164/prevent-duplicate-content-using-the-canonical-url-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/?p=164#comment-520</guid>
		<description>Hi, 

Thanks for the comment. The canocial tag (like 301 redirects and the meta you mention) is mean as another hint to search engines to index the correct, unique. It&#039;s another sign you can send (I&#039;d advise doing it alongside and method such as 301 redirects or using the method I described in a previous post on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/20/301-redirects-for-seo-using-htaccess/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www. and non www. versions&lt;/a&gt; of your site) to search engines saying where the correct content is located. For the effect required to implement this into something like wordpress or your own website, I think it&#039;s definately worth it.

It&#039;s also worth nothing that overall you&#039;re not only trying to help users, but also consolidate your page rankings from multiple urls, to a single one - teherby avoiding duplicate content penalties. 

I personally believe as many methods we have to prevent duplivate content, the better. For example, to manually integrate the canocial into your wordpress install the process is quite pain free - there&#039;s an excellent simple article here on how edit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bin-co.com/blog/2009/02/avoid-duplicate-content-use-canonical-url-in-wordpress-fix-plugin/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wordpress to prevent duplicate content&lt;/a&gt; (you only have to edit your header.php file - simple!)

There, I wrote way too much again for a comment reply :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment. The canocial tag (like 301 redirects and the meta you mention) is mean as another hint to search engines to index the correct, unique. It&#8217;s another sign you can send (I&#8217;d advise doing it alongside and method such as 301 redirects or using the method I described in a previous post on <a href="http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/20/301-redirects-for-seo-using-htaccess/" rel="nofollow">www. and non www. versions</a> of your site) to search engines saying where the correct content is located. For the effect required to implement this into something like wordpress or your own website, I think it&#8217;s definately worth it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also worth nothing that overall you&#8217;re not only trying to help users, but also consolidate your page rankings from multiple urls, to a single one &#8211; teherby avoiding duplicate content penalties. </p>
<p>I personally believe as many methods we have to prevent duplivate content, the better. For example, to manually integrate the canocial into your wordpress install the process is quite pain free &#8211; there&#8217;s an excellent simple article here on how edit <a href="http://www.bin-co.com/blog/2009/02/avoid-duplicate-content-use-canonical-url-in-wordpress-fix-plugin/" rel="nofollow">WordPress to prevent duplicate content</a> (you only have to edit your header.php file &#8211; simple!)</p>
<p>There, I wrote way too much again for a comment reply <img src='http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Company</title>
		<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/164/prevent-duplicate-content-using-the-canonical-url-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/?p=164#comment-519</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure you don&#039;t need this as you can use 301 redirects and the meta robots tag nindex, no follow to prevent it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure you don&#8217;t need this as you can use 301 redirects and the meta robots tag nindex, no follow to prevent it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

