<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prevent Duplicate Content using the Canonical Url Tag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/164/prevent-duplicate-content-using-the-canonical-url-tag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/164/prevent-duplicate-content-using-the-canonical-url-tag/</link>
	<description>Web Design &#38; Development Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: web design new york</title>
		<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/164/prevent-duplicate-content-using-the-canonical-url-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>web design new york</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/?p=164#comment-858</guid>
		<description>Thanks, we have often wondered how styop mutliple search pages getting indexed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, we have often wondered how styop mutliple search pages getting indexed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/164/prevent-duplicate-content-using-the-canonical-url-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/?p=164#comment-520</guid>
		<description>Hi, 

Thanks for the comment. The canocial tag (like 301 redirects and the meta you mention) is mean as another hint to search engines to index the correct, unique. It&#039;s another sign you can send (I&#039;d advise doing it alongside and method such as 301 redirects or using the method I described in a previous post on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/20/301-redirects-for-seo-using-htaccess/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www. and non www. versions&lt;/a&gt; of your site) to search engines saying where the correct content is located. For the effect required to implement this into something like wordpress or your own website, I think it&#039;s definately worth it.

It&#039;s also worth nothing that overall you&#039;re not only trying to help users, but also consolidate your page rankings from multiple urls, to a single one - teherby avoiding duplicate content penalties. 

I personally believe as many methods we have to prevent duplivate content, the better. For example, to manually integrate the canocial into your wordpress install the process is quite pain free - there&#039;s an excellent simple article here on how edit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bin-co.com/blog/2009/02/avoid-duplicate-content-use-canonical-url-in-wordpress-fix-plugin/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wordpress to prevent duplicate content&lt;/a&gt; (you only have to edit your header.php file - simple!)

There, I wrote way too much again for a comment reply :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment. The canocial tag (like 301 redirects and the meta you mention) is mean as another hint to search engines to index the correct, unique. It&#8217;s another sign you can send (I&#8217;d advise doing it alongside and method such as 301 redirects or using the method I described in a previous post on <a href="http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/20/301-redirects-for-seo-using-htaccess/" rel="nofollow">www. and non www. versions</a> of your site) to search engines saying where the correct content is located. For the effect required to implement this into something like wordpress or your own website, I think it&#8217;s definately worth it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also worth nothing that overall you&#8217;re not only trying to help users, but also consolidate your page rankings from multiple urls, to a single one &#8211; teherby avoiding duplicate content penalties. </p>
<p>I personally believe as many methods we have to prevent duplivate content, the better. For example, to manually integrate the canocial into your wordpress install the process is quite pain free &#8211; there&#8217;s an excellent simple article here on how edit <a href="http://www.bin-co.com/blog/2009/02/avoid-duplicate-content-use-canonical-url-in-wordpress-fix-plugin/" rel="nofollow">WordPress to prevent duplicate content</a> (you only have to edit your header.php file &#8211; simple!)</p>
<p>There, I wrote way too much again for a comment reply <img src='http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Company</title>
		<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/164/prevent-duplicate-content-using-the-canonical-url-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/?p=164#comment-519</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure you don&#039;t need this as you can use 301 redirects and the meta robots tag nindex, no follow to prevent it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure you don&#8217;t need this as you can use 301 redirects and the meta robots tag nindex, no follow to prevent it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
