<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: W3C Validation and SEO Benefits &#8211; My Opinion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/214/w3c-validation-seo-benefits-my-opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/214/w3c-validation-seo-benefits-my-opinion/</link>
	<description>Web Design &#38; Development Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Walls</title>
		<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/214/w3c-validation-seo-benefits-my-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-12038</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Walls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/?p=214#comment-12038</guid>
		<description>It is virtually impossible to validate now with all the non-validating social widgets, snippets and other code strings - and even links.

I can make all my code validate in any DTD - but, outside code inserts screw the pooch. Bottom line is  - if Google doesn&#039;t care I am not going to lose sleep over it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is virtually impossible to validate now with all the non-validating social widgets, snippets and other code strings &#8211; and even links.</p>
<p>I can make all my code validate in any DTD &#8211; but, outside code inserts screw the pooch. Bottom line is  &#8211; if Google doesn&#8217;t care I am not going to lose sleep over it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison Harper</title>
		<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/214/w3c-validation-seo-benefits-my-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-5714</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/?p=214#comment-5714</guid>
		<description>The difference between warning and errors. Warning would not stop the page from rendering, as errors could.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference between warning and errors. Warning would not stop the page from rendering, as errors could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard @ Web Design Leeds</title>
		<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/214/w3c-validation-seo-benefits-my-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-4093</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard @ Web Design Leeds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 01:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/?p=214#comment-4093</guid>
		<description>My thinking is that Google&#039;s robot works in a very similar way to a screen reader, and whilst most sites will show fine if the code doesn&#039;t validate, they are more likely to work correctly if it does.  So, likewise, a validating site is more likely to be read correctly by Google.

A validating site would also see that beneficial things such as alt tags for the images are in place. 

That all said, I do believe that 70% of on-site SEO is merely choosing the right title tag.  As such, I worry more about SEOs who damage the code (multiple h1 tags etc) and accessibility in favour of (often unproven) theories on what might help ranking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thinking is that Google&#8217;s robot works in a very similar way to a screen reader, and whilst most sites will show fine if the code doesn&#8217;t validate, they are more likely to work correctly if it does.  So, likewise, a validating site is more likely to be read correctly by Google.</p>
<p>A validating site would also see that beneficial things such as alt tags for the images are in place. </p>
<p>That all said, I do believe that 70% of on-site SEO is merely choosing the right title tag.  As such, I worry more about SEOs who damage the code (multiple h1 tags etc) and accessibility in favour of (often unproven) theories on what might help ranking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twizzlebird</title>
		<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/214/w3c-validation-seo-benefits-my-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-3822</link>
		<dc:creator>twizzlebird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/?p=214#comment-3822</guid>
		<description>I would generally always strive for validation unless there is a strong reason not to. Managing, updating and dealing with deprecation on sites that validate is always easier but sometimes page weight and other factors drive validation down the list of priorities. Generally if a page of mine doesn&#039;t validate it&#039;s for a specific reason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would generally always strive for validation unless there is a strong reason not to. Managing, updating and dealing with deprecation on sites that validate is always easier but sometimes page weight and other factors drive validation down the list of priorities. Generally if a page of mine doesn&#8217;t validate it&#8217;s for a specific reason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Webb</title>
		<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/214/w3c-validation-seo-benefits-my-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-3821</link>
		<dc:creator>David Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/?p=214#comment-3821</guid>
		<description>Good stuff - thanks,

David.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff &#8211; thanks,</p>
<p>David.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CCTV Equipment</title>
		<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/214/w3c-validation-seo-benefits-my-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-3275</link>
		<dc:creator>CCTV Equipment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/?p=214#comment-3275</guid>
		<description>Nice article, good points, all of which i agree with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, good points, all of which i agree with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W3 Online Schools</title>
		<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/214/w3c-validation-seo-benefits-my-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-3098</link>
		<dc:creator>W3 Online Schools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 13:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/?p=214#comment-3098</guid>
		<description>nice articles
thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice articles<br />
thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Timmonds</title>
		<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/214/w3c-validation-seo-benefits-my-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-2929</link>
		<dc:creator>David Timmonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 12:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/?p=214#comment-2929</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2886&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Derek_UK &lt;/a&gt; 

The difference between warning and errors. Warning would not stop the page from rendering, as errors could.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-2886" rel="nofollow">@Derek_UK </a> </p>
<p>The difference between warning and errors. Warning would not stop the page from rendering, as errors could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek_UK</title>
		<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/214/w3c-validation-seo-benefits-my-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-2886</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek_UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 20:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/?p=214#comment-2886</guid>
		<description>What do you mean when you say &#039;Validator error severity&#039;, I don&#039;t get it :) Excuse the noobness</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean when you say &#8216;Validator error severity&#8217;, I don&#8217;t get it <img src='http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Excuse the noobness</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/214/w3c-validation-seo-benefits-my-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-2883</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/?p=214#comment-2883</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment. Everyione will have a different view on this and could write a book about the issue :) 

I&#039;m not saying all validation is wrong, I&#039;m mainly talking about the small syntax errors that have minimal, if any effect on how a page is displayed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment. Everyione will have a different view on this and could write a book about the issue <img src='http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying all validation is wrong, I&#8217;m mainly talking about the small syntax errors that have minimal, if any effect on how a page is displayed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

